Table 3.
Odds ratios of meeting recommended levels of walking (≥150 min/week) by transportation walking associated with accessibility, intensity, and diversity of five discrete land use categories in MESA 2000–2002. (n=1975, neighborhood n=331)
North Carolinaa (n=970) |
New Yorka (n=1005) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Discrete Land Use | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Accessibility (1 site-specific standard deviation increase in distance) | Social | 0.96 (0.87, 1.06) | 0.85 (0.73, 0.97)** |
Night | 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) | 0.95 (0.82, 1.10) | |
Physical Activity | 1.02 (0.92, 1.14) | 0.93 (0.81, 1.08) | |
Auto-Oriented | 0.93 (0.81, 1.06) | 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) | |
Parking | 0.97 (0.87, 1.09) | 1.03 (0.88, 1.21) | |
Intensity (1 site-specific standard deviation increase in count) | Social | 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.26) |
Night | 0.99 (0.88, 1.11) | 1.15 (0.99, 1.35)* | |
Physical Activity | 1.00(0.84, 1.18) | 1.16 (0.99, 1.35)* | |
Auto-Oriented | 1.02 (0.92, 1.14) | 0.96 (0.83, 1.12) | |
Parking | 0.98 (0.90, 1.08) | 0.91 (0.78, 1.05) | |
Diversity (1 type of land use increase) | All five uses | 1.06 (0.99, 1.14) | 1.03 (0.77, 1.38) |
Model adjusted for individual characteristics: age, race/ethnicity, gender, income, education and mode of questionnaire administration. Accounts for clustering by census tract.
p<0.1
p<0.05