Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 28;4:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2013.11.004

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The body weight and epididymal fat weight of the KitW-sh/W-sh mice fed an HFD were less than those of the Kit+/+ mice. (A) Body weight gain in the Kit+/+ mice (black square) and KitW-sh/W-sh mice (gray circle) fed an ND (left panel) or HFD (right panel) for 16 weeks. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus the Kit+/+ mice. (B and C) Body weight (B) and epididymal fat weight (C) of the Kit+/+ and KitW-sh/W-sh mice that consumed an ND or HFD for 16 weeks. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 for the comparisons indicated. NS, not significant. n = 12 for each group.