Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;20(6):310–318. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1612

TABLE III.

Changes in symptom severity, fatigue, distress, coping, and quality of life

Variable Pts (n) Baseline score (mean) Change in score
p Value Effect sizea
Mean 95% ci
Symptom severityb
  Weakness 129 5.5±2.0 1.5 1.1 to 1.8 <0.0001 0.7
  Depression 126 3.3±2.5 1.4 1.1 to 1.8 <0.0001 0.7
  Nervousness 124 3.7±2.6 1.3 0.9 to 1.7 <0.0001 0.6
  Shortness of breath 128 3.6±2.8 1.2 0.8 to 1.7 <0.0001 0.5
  Sleepiness 129 3.9±2.9 1.1 0.6 to 1.6 <0.0001 0.4
  Insomnia 129 4.1±2.7 1.0 0.5 to 1.4 0.0001 0.4
  Pain 127 3.6±2.8 1.0 0.5 to 1.4 <0.0001 0.4
  Anorexia 127 4.0±2.9 1.0 0.5 to 1.4 <0.0001 0.4
Fatigue dimensionc
  Reduced activity 70 14.1±4.1 4.6 3.6 to 5.6 <0.0001 1.1
  Physical fatigue 72 14.5±4.3 3.7 2.6 to 4.7 <0.001 0.8
  General fatigue 71 13.8±3.8 2.8 1.8 to 3.8 <0.0001 0.7
  Decreased motivation 71 9.9±3.5 1.6 0.8 to 2.5 0.0004 0.4
  Mental fatigue 71 10.0±4.1 1.7 0.8 to 2.6 0.0005 0.4
Distressd 126 4.2±2.6 1.4 0.9 to 1.9 <0.0001 0.5
Copinge 77 4.1±2.7 1.8 1.2 to 2.4 <0.0001 0.7
Quality of lifef 129 4.5±2.3 1.0 0.6 to 1.3 <0.0001 0.5
a

Small: 0.2–0.5; moderate: 0.5–08; strong: >0.8.

b

Measured using the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, which ranges from 0 (symptom is absent) to 10 (worst possible symptom severity).

c

Measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, in which each fatigue dimension is scored out of 20, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

d

Measured using the Distress Thermometer, which ranges from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress).

e

Measured using the Coping Thermometer, which ranges from 0 (no difficulty coping) to 10 (great difficulty coping).

f

Measured using the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, which ranges from 0 (excellent quality of life) to 10 (very bad quality of life).