Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;20(6):319–325. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1438

TABLE II.

Potential predictors of time to publication (univariate analyses)

Factor Hazard ratio p Value
Conference
  asco vs. ispor 1.94 0.038a
  ash vs. ispor 2.03 0.072
icer
  Dominant icer 1.21 0.639
  icer < US$20,000 0.99 0.963
  icer < US$50,000 1.19 0.568
  icer < US$100,000 1.38 0.452
  Cost–utility analysis 0.79 0.349
Cancer type
  Breast 1.40 0.188
  Lung 0.60 0.481
  Colorectal 0.77 0.544
  Prostate 0.43 0.237
  Hematologic 1.34 0.287
Drug therapy 1.53 0.234
Curative intent therapy 1.63 0.705
Country
  United States 1.57 0.077
  United Kingdom 1.09 0.818
  Canada 0.46 0.096
  European (non–United Kingdom) 1.19 0.532
Abstract quality
  Base year mentioned 1.10 0.728
  Time horizon mentioned 1.16 0.562
  Use of life time horizon 1.67 0.065
  Discounting mentioned 0.94 0.806
  Perspective mentioned 0.62 0.049a
  Use of societal perspective 0.50 0.051
  Sensitivity analysis mentioned 1.75 0.063
  Use of psa 1.42 0.245
  Financial conflict of interest 1.07 0.845
a

Significant at p < 0.05.

icer = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; asco = American Society of Clinical Oncology; ash = American Society of Hematology; ispor = International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; psa = probabilistic sensitivity analysis.