Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 3;6:76. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-76

Table 5.

Multivariate Cox analysis of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among 327 patients having either cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) or histologic BM involvement (BMIhisto+) and among R-CHOP treated patients (n = 200)*

 
 
OS
PFS
Risk factors No. of patients (%) HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Total patients with CAs and/or BMIhisto+ (n = 327)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Presence of ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities as a risk factor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  IPI risk group, high vs. low
123 (37.6)
6.46
1.56-26.72
0.010
7.15
1.73-29.46
0.007
  R-CHOP treatment, R-CHOP vs. others
200 (61.2)
0.26
0.18-0.35
<0.001
0.38
0.28-0.51
<0.001
  ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities vs. 0 or 1 abnormality
138 (42.2)
2.49
1.75-3.54
<0.001
2.12
1.53-2.93
<0.001
Presence of specific cytogenetic abnormalities as risk factors
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  IPI risk group, high vs. low
123 (37.6)
8.34
2.04-24.09
0.003
8.43
2.06-34.44
0.003
  R-CHOP treatment, R-CHOP vs. others
200 (61.2)
0.24
0.17-0.34
<0.001
0.32
0.24-0.44
<0.001
  19p13 abnormality present vs. absent
24 (7.3)
2.67
1.50-4.76
0.001
3.02
1.85-4.93
<0.001
  7q22 abnormality present vs. absent
11 (3.4)
3.03
1.51.-6.06
0.002
NS
NS
NS
  12q22-q24 abnormality present vs. absent
12 (3.7)
2.68
1.37.-5.26
0.004
NS
NS
NS
  18q21 abnormality present vs. absent
21 (6.4)
2.11
1.22.-3.64
0.007
NS
NS
NS
  16q22-q24 abnormality present vs. absent
14 (4.3)
2.27
1.23-4.18
0.009
NS
NS
NS
  11q23-q25 abnormality present vs. absent
19 (5.8)
1.81
1.03-3.15
0.038
NS
NS
NS
  8q24 abnormality present vs. absent
19 (5.8)
NS
NS
NS
2.61
1.54-4.43
<0.001
R-CHOP treated patients with CAs and/or BMIhisto+ (n = 200)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Presence of ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities as a risk factor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  IPI risk group, high vs. low
67 (33.5)
5.29
1.23-22.86
0.026
5.55
1.32-23.37
0.020
  Male vs. female
112 (56.0)
1.71
1.01-2.91
0.046
NS
NS
NS
  ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities vs. 0 or 1 abnormality
78 (39.0)
2.01
1.17-3.45
0.012
2.15
1.38-3.38
0.001
Presence of specific cytogenetic abnormalities as risk factors
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  IPI risk group, high vs. low
67 (33.5)
5.92
1.40-25.04
0.016
7.61
1.82-31.92
0.006
  Male vs. female
112 (56.0)
2.00
1.15-3.47
0.014
1.71
1.09-2.69
0.021
  19q13 abnormality present vs. absent
13 (6.5)
3.36
1.50-7.54
0.003
NS
NS
NS
  12q22-q24 abnormality present vs. absent
6 (3.0)
3.65
1.42-9.44
0.007
NS
NS
NS
  19p13 abnormality present vs. absent
16 (8.0)
2.85
1.20-6.80
0.018
3.31
1.68-6.51
0.001
  8q24 abnormality present vs. absent 13 (6.5) 2.54 1.24-5.23 0.011 2.43 1.24-4.73 0.009

*The multivariate Cox regression models initially included age, gender, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk groups, history of R-CHOP treatment, presence of histologic bone marrow involvement, and either presence of ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities, or presence of specific cytogenetic abnormalities found in minimum 5 R-CHOP-treated patients and associated with significant poor prosnosis in the univariate analysis (+3, -17, abnormalities at 14q32, 3q25-q27, 19p13, 8q24, 7q22, 1q21-q23, 18q21, 19q13, 9q34, 22q11, 11q23-q25, 12q22-q24, 16q22-q24, and deletion 6q). The stepwise selection procedure was used to select variables in the final models.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NS, not significant.