Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 7;33(12):1886–1896. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.134

Table 2. Comparison of binding potential values between the 1T compartment model and MA1.

  BPNDa
BPP(mL/cm3)a
BPF(mL/cm3)a
Regions 1T MA1b MA1b MA1b
Amygdala 3.60 (34%) 3.07 (24%) 32.29 (26%) 393 (35%)
Putamen 3.25 (11%) 2.89 (8%) 30.43 (17%) 365 (19%)
Thalamus 3.08 (13%) 2.81 (12%) 29.76 (23%) 352 (18%)
Caudate 2.49 (16%) 2.14 (14%) 22.31 (13%) 270 (23%)
Hippocampus 1.19 (21%) 1.10 (20%) 11.71 (31%) 140 (30%)
Ant. cingulate cortex 1.23 (14%) 1.12 (12%) 11.72 (17%) 141 (22%)
Post. cingulate cortex 0.77 (16%) 0.69 (17%) 7.21 (21%) 86 (21%)
Occipital lobe 0.74 (10%) 0.67 (10%) 7.09 (23%) 84 (21%)
Temporal lobe 0.69 (17%) 0.62 (16%) 6.41 (15%) 78 (27%)
Frontal lobe 0.63 (10%) 0.57 (10%) 6.02 (18%) 72 (22%)
Raphe midbrain 24.0 (141%) 13.62 (55%) 140.49 (50%) 1769 (61%)
Raphe pons 12.5 (107%) 8.84 (67%) 89.47 (58%) 1143 (72%)

COV, coefficients of variation; 1T, one tissue; MA1, multilinear analysis-1.

a

Values are means (%COV, intersubject variability) in 10 subjects.

b

t* was set to 40 minutes after injection.