Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Psychother. 2011 Feb 1;25(1):10.1891/0889-8391.25.1.31. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.25.1.31

TABLE 2.

Means and Effect Sizes for Main Effects of Expectancy and Drug Manipulations for Cigarette Ratings

Instructed
Received
THC
Placebo
THC
Placebo
M (SD) M (SD) Effect Size M (SD) M (SD) Effect Size
Taste 1.46 1.39 1.02 1.28 .02 1.62 1.42 0.86 1.16 .09**
Smell 1.61 1.17 1.09 1.07 .05* 1.55 1.23 1.14 1.02 .04*
Similarity 1.05 1.21 0.56 0.95 .06** 1.25 1.31 0.37 0.62 .20***
Potency 2.07 0.92 0.96 1.21 .31*** 2.21 1.06 0.82 0.91 .41***
THC content 1.55 0.69 0.51 0.78 .38*** 1.35 0.97 0.70 0.68 .19***
Satisfaction 1.93 1.29 0.96 1.24 .13*** 1.91 1.34 0.98 1.20 .18***
Liking 1.93 1.33 1.07 1.28 .11*** 1.95 1.37 1.05 1.23 .17***
Feel better 1.54 1.23 0.82 1.15 .12*** 1.60 1.27 0.77 1.07 .14**

Note. Means (SD) are from Tl postsmoking assessment for all variables except for Potency and THC content ratings completed at T2. Effect sizes for expectancy and drug between-subject effects are indicated as partial η2 from 2 (Tl and T2) × 2 (Drug) × 2 (Expectancy) repeated measures analyses of variance. There were no significant interaction effects with time or drug × expectancy, except for taste: expectancy by time, F(1, 110) = 4.34, p < .05, with higher T2 than Tl ratings in the Told THC vs. Placebo.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.