TABLE 3.
Correlations Among T1 Postsmoking Affect–related Variables by Drug Manipulation Condition
| Variable | M | SD | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Received Placebo (n = 57) | |||||||||
| 1. ΔHR | 73.35 | 11.55 | — | ||||||
| 2. SAM-A | 1.69 | 0.80 | .03 | — | |||||
| 3. ARCI-M | 1.53 | 1.79 | –.06 | .19 | — | ||||
| 4. ΔPOMSa | 0.53 | 1.47 | .21 | –.16 | –.08 | — | |||
| 5. Feel better | 0.77 | 1.07 | –.02 | .13 | .35** | –.23 | — | ||
| 6. SAM-V | 3.85 | 0.65 | –.12 | .21 | .20 | –.10 | .11 | — | |
| 7. Expectancy | — | — | .002 | .02 | .20 | –.13 | .38** | .29* | — |
| Received THC (n = 57) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. ΔHR | 113.75 | 23.90 | — | ||||||
| 2. SAM-A | 2.33 | 1.09 | .14 | — | |||||
| 3. ARCI-M | 5.13 | 2.65 | .09 | .38** | — | ||||
| 4. ΔPOMSa | 1.86 | 2.46 | .09 | .34* | .30* | — | |||
| 5. Feel better | 1.60 | 1.27 | –.01 | –.20 | .17 | –.16 | — | ||
| 6. SAM-V | 4.04 | 0.74 | .002 | –.02 | .25 | –.05 | .39** | — | |
| 7. Expectancy | — | — | .01 | .07 | .11 | –.09 | –.29* | –.04 | — |
Note. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients reported for correlations for the Expectancy manipulation variable; all other correlation statistics are based on Pearson's Product-Moment correlation coefficients. SAM-V = Self-Assessment Manikin Valence (possible range: 1–5); SAM-A = Self-Assessment Manikin Arousal (possible range: 1–5); ΔPOMS = POMS Tension-Anxiety Scale Presmoke to Postsmoke Change Score, correlations based on square-root transformed values but means (SD) based on raw values for interpretation (possible range: 0–4); ΔHR = Heart Rate Presmoke to Postsmoke Change Score but means (SD) based on responses at T1; ARCI-M = ARCI-Marijuana Scale Summary Score (possible range: 0–12); Feel Better = Cigarette Rating “Made Me Feel Better” (possible range: 0–4); Expectancy = Expectancy Manipulation (0 = Told Placebo, 1 = Told THC).
POMS variables: n = 47 in placebo conditions and n = 50 in THC conditions.
p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .01