Table 1.

Intercorrelations Between COACH Treatment Fidelity Variables, Observed Caregiver Engagement, and Positive Behavior Support

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1. Conceptual accuracy and adherence to the FCU model	—	.57**	.58**	.66**	.61**	.80**	.30**	.06	.06	.19	.05
2. Observant and responsive to client needs		—	.62**	.56**	.68**	.82**	.44**	.02	3.04	.03	.02
3. Accurately structures sessions to optimize effectiveness			—	.66**	.71**	.84**	.37**	.03	.01	.18	.20
4. Careful and appropriate teaching and corrective feedback				—	.78**	.87**	.21	.22	.05	.06	.08
5. Hope and motivation are generated					—	.90**	.38**	.23*	.13	.07	.01
6. COACH composite score						—	.40**	.14	.05	.14	.09
7. Observed client engagement in the feedback session							—	3.01	.21	.04	.05
8. Positive behavior support (child age 2)								—	.44*	3.29*	3.39**
9. Positive behavior support (child age 3)									—	3.31**	3.30**
10. Child problem behavior on CBCL (age 2)										—	.12
11. Child problem behavior on CBCL (age 4)											—
M	5.81	5.59	5.40	5.62	5.67	5.59	6.00			66.37	6.30
SD	1.33	1.56	1.47	1.51	1.70	1.28	1.61			57.64	10.47

Note. N = 79. Correlations were calculated using a Pearson’s r. Means and standard deviations are not reported for positive behavior support because this variable is a z-score. Externalizing scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) are reported as a T-score. FCU = Family Check-Up.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.