Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 8;8:232. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-232

Table 2.

Comparison of dosimetric parameters from treatment plans obtained in the two setup positions for the whole patients series (41 patients)

  Prone setup Supine setup p-value
PTV (cc)
534.9 ± 229.4
515.3 ± 174.2
0.32
 V95 (%)
96.5 ± 3.5
98.0 ± 1.6
0.04
 V105 (%)
1.4 ± 1.1
2.0 ± 2.5
0.14
 V107 (%)
0.1 ± 0.2
0.2 ± 0.5
0.16
 Dmin (Gy)
35.8 ± 11.3
35.8 ± 10.2
0.97
 Dmax (Gy)
53.7 ± 0.6
53.7 ± 0.6
0.80
 Dmean (Gy)
50.1 ± 0.4
50.1 ± 0.3
0.42
CTV (cc)
468.1 ± 216.6
432.0 ± 159.0
0.02
 V95 (%)
98.4 ± 2.3
99.3 ± 1.0
0.02
 V105 (%)
1.3 ± 1.1
1.8 ± 2.4
0.25
 V107 (%)
0.1 ± 0.2
0.1 ± 0.4
0.45
 Dmin (Gy)
42.4 ± 7.4
44.4 ± 4.4
0.15
 Dmax (Gy)
53.6 ± 0.6
53.5 ± 0.6
0.42
 Dmean (Gy)
50.2 ± 0.4
50.2 ± 0.3
0.92
Lung (cc)
1335.0 ± 331.0
1201.0 ± 264.0
<10-6
 V20 (%)
1.5 ± 1.8
9.0 ± 3.4
<10-6
 V10 (%)
2.6 ± 2.4
12.7 ± 4.3
<10-6
 V5 (%)
4.0 ± 3.2
18.4 ± 5.3
<10-6
 Dmean (Gy)
1.4 ± 0.9
5.2 ± 1.5
<10-6
 Dmax (Gy) 39.7 ± 12.4 49.5 ± 1.7 <10-5

PTV, planning target volume; CTV, clinical target volume.