Table V.
Left column: Maximin (top) and compound (bottom) designs for several scenarios (details given in the text). Right column: Relative efficiencies compared to the optimal designs for each model from Table I.
Scenario | Design specification | Relative efficiencies | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
d1, w1 | d2, w2 | d3, w3 | d4, w4 | d5, w5 | linear | beta | Emax 1 | Emax 2 | logistic | |
Maximin design
| ||||||||||
(A) | 0 | 47.66 | 176.82 | 452.21 | 500 | 0.5727 | 0.5727 | 0.5727 | 0.6755 | 0.5727 |
0.356 | 0.197 | 0.224 | 0.056 | 0.167 | ||||||
| ||||||||||
(B) | 0 | 62.5 | 125 | 250 | 500 | 0.5727 | 0.4318 | 0.4875 | 0.6113 | 0.4182 |
0.286 | 0.236 | 0.134 | 0.103 | 0.241 | ||||||
| ||||||||||
(C) | 0 | 47.66 | 176.82 | 452.21 | 500 | 0.5727 | 0.4382 | 0.5613 | 0.6293 | 0.5045 |
0.318 | 0.259 | 0.178 | 0.009 | 0.236 | ||||||
| ||||||||||
Compound design with αi = 0.2
| ||||||||||
(A) | 0 | 45.86 | 182.1 | 433.63 | 500 | 0.4494 | 0.6091 | 0.5921 | 0.7247 | 0.6990 |
0.384 | 0.192 | 0.270 | 0.035 | 0.119 | ||||||
| ||||||||||
(B) | 0 | 62.5 | 125 | 250 | 500 | 0.4494 | 0.4734 | 0.4513 | 0.7132 | 0.3714 |
0.322 | 0.181 | 0.197 | 0.144 | 0.156 | ||||||
| ||||||||||
(C) | 0 | 45.86 | 182.1 | 433.63 | 500 | 0.4494 | 0.6091 | 0.5921 | 0.7247 | 0.6990 |
0.384 | 0.192 | 0.270 | 0.035 | 0.119 |