Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 2;2:26. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-26

Table 2.

Effectiveness of post-discharge cleaning of high-touch surfaces, evaluated by four methods

Surface sampled Number sampled Mean aerobic colony count (± SE) Number (%) clean by visual inspection Median ATP RLU (range) Number (%) clean by FM
Bedrail
20
1.5 (0.9)
9 (45.0)
63 (13–806)
6 (30.0)
Tray table
20
2.3 (1.2)
11 (55.0)
123.5 (26–4185)
17 (85.0)
Call button
20
38.7 (25.8)
10 (50.0)
276 (23–3601)
15 (75.0)
Telephone
20
7.7 (2.5)
12 (60.0)
166 (30–1863)
16 (80.0)
Bedside table
20
1.9 (0.9)
9 (45.0)
91 (15–889)
9 (45.0)
Chair
16
23.9 (13.1)
9 (56.3)
305.5 (53–1472)
3 (18.8)
Room sink
16
9.1 (3.7)
6 (37.5)
94.5 (11–511)
8 (50.0)
Room light switch
19
5.5 (2.2)
15 (79.0)
49 (5–314)
6 (31.6)
Room door knob
20
5.7 (2.9)
10 (50.0)
108.5 (18–354)
2 (10.0)
Bathroom light switch
20
4.4 (2.1)
13 (65.0)
138.5 (15–1716)
5 (25.0)
Bathroom hand rail
20
204.7 (195.6)
11 (55.0)
284 (14–6068)
5 (25.0)
Bathroom sink
20
10.5 (6.2)
7 (35.0)
160 (30–1610)
13 (65.0)
Toilet seat
20
19.5 (15.1)
18 (90.0)
74.5 (14–258)
19 (95.0)
Toilet flush handle
19
133.8 (78.5)
16 (84.2)
179 (33–1245)
14 (73.7)
Bedpan cleaner
20
21.4 (9.8)
9 (45.0)
190.5 (10–1530)
5 (25.0)
Total 290 32.9 (14.7) 165 (56.9) 130.5 (10–6068) 143 (49.3)

Note: SE, standard error; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; RLU, relative light units; FM, fluorescent marker.