Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;22(12):1049–1055. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4093

Table 2.

Characteristics of Women Reporting Occasional Incontinence (n= 3916)

Characteristic HbA1c <6% (n=343) HbA1c 6-7% (n=1388) HbA1c 7-8% (n=1109) HbA1c 8-9% (n=552) HbA1c 9%+ (n=524) p*
Demographics
Mean age, years (±SD) 59.8 (10.4) 60.7 (9.6) 59.1 (9.5) 57.0 (9.8) 54.4 (9.9) <0.001 (trend)
 Ethnicity, %
  White 41 30 25 23 18 <0.001
  Black 13 16 16 15 24  
  Latino 20 16 20 22 28  
  Asian 11 13 12 10 3  
  Filipino 5 12 14 14 10  
  Other 10 13 13 16 17  
Socioeconomic measures
 Education, %
  No degree/GED 19 18 16 15 18 0.04
  HS/technical/AA 59 56 56 58 60  
  Bachelors 13 18 19 21 16  
  Post graduate 9 8 9 6 6  
 Income, %
  <$25,000 26 27 22 23 21 0.19
  $25,000–$49,999 32 31 32 31 35  
  $50,000–$79,999 21 22 25 26 24  
  ≥$80,000 21 20 21 20 20  
DxCG comorbidity score (±SD) 4.7 (6.1) 4.5 (4.9) 4.5 (4.3) 5.2 (4.9) 5.2 (5.1) 0.004 (trend)
Number of births, %
 0 13 11 12 13 13 0.07
 1–2 45 37 36 41 39  
 ≥3 42 52 52 46 48  
Body mass index, %
 <25 18 19 16 14 9 <0.001
 25–30 33 27 26 25 26  
 30–35 22 23 27 25 28  
 >35 27 31 31 36 37  
Diabetes duration in years (±SD) 7.7 (8.0) 9.6 (8.8) 10.9 (8.6) 12.2 (9.5) 11.6 (8.0) <0.001 (trend)
Diabetes treatment, %
 Diet only 36 18 4 2 1 <0.001
 Pills only 55 66 69 58 53  
 Insulin only 6 8 10 14 15  
 Insulin and pills 3 8 17 26 31  
Limitations due to incontinence
 No effect 50 44 43 40 41 0.27
 Slight effect 33 33 34 36 36  
 Moderate effect 9 12 12 11 11  
 Quite a bit/extreme effect 8 11 11 13 12  
*

p-values are ANOVA for categorical variables and test for trend for continuous variables.