Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;16(3):616–628. doi: 10.1105/tpc.019398

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Characterization of Vegetative Growth of Rboh Antisense Plants.

(A) Top panel, quantitative chart of appearance of secondary branches in wild-type and antisense plants. Each column represents an independent antisense line. Bottom panel, antisense plant line M4 showing a bushy phenotype.

(B) Top panel, quantitative chart of appearance of leaf curl in wild-type and antisense plants. Each column in the chart represents an independent antisense line. The analysis was performed using a 0 to 3 severity score as shown in the bottom panel, with 0 representing the wild type and 3 representing the most severe curling.

(C) Top panel, quantitative analysis of inverted leaflets in wild-type and antisense plants. Each column in the chart represents an independent antisense line. The analysis was performed using a 1 to 5 severity score (see Methods). The bottom panel illustrates wild-type leaflets and leaflets from an antisense line.