Table 2.
Treatment results.
| Article | Number of implants | Lenght and/or surface of implants | Follow up | Success rate % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esposito [7] | 60 | 5 mm | <1 y | Not applicable |
| Deporter [8] | 48 | 7; 9 mm/rough | <50.3 m, mean 32.6 m | 100% |
| Deporter [9] | 26 | 5 mm | 1–8 y | 83.7%mx 100%md |
| Sanchez-Garces [10] | 273 | ≤10 mm/154 machined, 119 rough | 1.8–12 y | 92.67% |
| Fugazzotto [11] | 2073 | <10 mm | ≤84 m | 99.2% |
| Bruggenkate [12] | 253 (42mx/146md) | 6 mm/plasma sprayed | 1–7 y | 97% |
| Misch [13] | 745 | 7 and 9 mm | 1–5 y | 98.9% |
| Malo [14] | 409 (130mx/278md) | 7 mm; 8,5 mm/272 machined, 136 TiUnte | <5 y | 96.2% – 7mm 97.1% – 8.5 mm |
| Testori [15] | 405/158-short (282mx/123md) | 7; 8.5 and 10 mm | 3 y | 98.9% 97.5% |
| Renouard [16] | 96 | 6 and 8.5 mm/54 machined, 42 TiUnite | >2 y, average 37.6 m | 94.6% |
| Griffin [17] | 168 (89mx/79md) | 8 mm/rough | ≤68 m, mean 34.9 | 100% |
| Anitua [18] | 1287 (570mx/717md) | <8.5 mm | 1–8 y | 98.8% |
| Romeo [19] | 265 | 8; 10 mm/rough | 3–14 y | 97.9% – 8mm 97.1% – 10mm |
m – month; y – year; mx – maxilla; md – mandible.