Table 1.
Cross-validated results showing the performance of the three search strategies in positioning targets to within the published error margin of OPM
| |
Within OPM error |
Outside OPM error |
All targets |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search type | Type | Within OPM error | Mean tilt | Max tilt | Mean tilt | Max tilt | Mean tilt | Max tilt |
| GA |
Alpha |
86.9% |
0.56 |
2.98 |
3.58 |
7.61 |
1.07 |
2.12 |
| Direct |
Alpha |
80.3% |
0.77 |
4.83 |
6.94 |
28.44 |
1.98 |
2.66 |
| Grid |
Alpha |
79.2% |
0.74 |
3.74 |
5.04 |
14.68 |
1.63 |
1.67 |
| GA |
Beta |
80.6% |
1.03 |
3.62 |
9.25 |
20.02 |
3.77 |
3.82 |
| Direct |
Beta |
83.3% |
1.76 |
6.90 |
13.71 |
29.97 |
3.75 |
3.03 |
| Grid | Beta | 77.7% | 2.35 | 10.03 | 14.12 | 37.64 | 4.97 | 2.74 |
Type indicates alpha-helical or beta-barrel. Tilt angles are the deltas compared to OPM and are measured in degrees. Mean z-shift is the mean z-coordinate delta compared to OPM calculated using all transmembrane segment boundary residues, measured in angstroms.