Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Nutr. 2013 May 22;33:10.1146/annurev-nutr-112912-095300. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-112912-095300

Table 2.

Studies evaluating postdiagnosis total dietary fat in relation to breast cancer and all-cause mortalitya

Reference Location Design Sample (n) Dietary
assessment
method
Contrast RR/HR
(95% CI) for
breast cancer
mortality
RR/HR
(95% CI) for
all-cause
mortality
Covariates

Newman et al. 1986 (42) Canada Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
300 females with
nonmetastatic
disease
Age: 3 5–74 years
87 deaths
73 breast cancer
deaths
Diet history,
24-hour
recall
Diet record
RR of dying from
breast cancer
associated with
greater than
average daily
total fat intake
(77.7 g) near
diagnosis
0.99 (p = 0.963) Not available Weight near time
of diagnosis

Nomura et al. 1991 (43) United
States
(Hawaii)
Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
182 Japanese
161 Caucasian
Age: 45–74 years
Diet history
interview
High versus low
fat intake (g/wk)
In Japanese
women:
0.66 (0.25–1.76)
In Caucasian
women:
3.17 (1.17–8.55)
Not available Disease stage,
menopausal
status, obesity
index, estrogen
use

Ewertz et al. 1991 (20) Denmark Prospective
cohort study
2,445 patients
with stage I—III
invasive breast
cancer
Age: < 70 years
805 deaths
FFQ Fat consumption
(quartiles)
Quartile 4
versus 1
Not available

0.96 (0.75–1.22)
Tumor size, skin
invasion,
number of
positive lymph
nodes, grade,
and stratified for
residence

Rohan et al. 1993 (50) Australia Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
412 cases
Age: 20–74 years
112 breast cancer
deaths
FFQ Total fat (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.40 (0.66–2.96) Not available Energy, age at
menarche, BMI

Holmes et al. 1999 (25) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
1,982 women
with invasive
breast cancer
686
premenopausal
1,267
postmenopausal
FFQ Total fat (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.44 (1.01–2.04) 1.51 (1.02–2.24) Age, diet interval,
calendar year of
diagnosis, BMI,
oral
contraceptive
use, menopausal
status, HRT,
smoking, age at
first birth and
parity, number
of metastatic
lymph nodes,
tumor size,
energy

Goodwin et al. 2003 (22) Canada Prospective
cohort study
477 women with
surgically
resected breast
cancer
Age <75 years
52 deaths
50 breast cancer
deaths
FFQ Quadratic form
of:
Total fat (g/d)
Quintile 1
versus 5
Not available 2.9 (p = 0.10)
1.7 (p = 0.03)
Age, energy,
BMI, tumor and
nodule stage,
HRT, adjuvant
chemotherapy
Total fat
(% energy)
Quintile 1
versus 5

Chlebowski et al. 2006
(15)
United
States
RCT 2,437 women
with resected
early-stage
breast cancer
receiving
conventional
cancer
management
Intervention:
n = 975
Control:
n = 1,462
Age: 48–79 years
Intervention:
low-fat diet
postdiagno-
sis (20% of
energy
from fat)
Both groups
had 30% of
energy
from fat at
baseline
Overall survival
in intervention
versus control
Not available 0.89 (0.65–1.21) Systemic
adjuvant
therapy, nodal
status, tumor
size,
mastectomy
Recurrence-free
survival in
intervention
versus control
0.71 (0.53–0.94)
Disease-free
survival in
intervention
versus control
0.81 (0.65–0.99)
Relapse-free
survival in
intervention
versus control
0.76 (0.60–0.98)

Pierce et al. 2007 (46) United
States
RCT 3,088 women
previously
treated for early
breast cancer
Age: 18–70 years
Intervention:
n = 1,537
155 deaths
127 breast cancer
deaths
Control:
n = 1,551
160 deaths
135 breast cancer
Deaths
Intervention:
Very high
vegetable,
fruit, and
fiber and
low-fat diet
Control:
5-a-day
dietary
guidelines
Intervention
effects:
Fat (% energy)
Quartile 4
versus 1
Not available 0.98 (0.64–1.49) Anti-estrogen
use,
oophorectomy
status, and
stratification
factors (tumor
stage, clinic site,
and age)

Beasley et al. 2011 (9) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
4,441 women
with history of
invasive breast
cancer and no
history of
recurrence
Age: 29–70 years
525 breast cancer
Deaths
FFQ Total fat (%
energy)
Age, state of
residence,
menopausal
status, smoking,
disease stage,
alcohol, history
of HRT,
energy,
treatment, BMI,
physical activity
Quintile 5
versus 1
0.92 (0.53–1.60) 1.05 (0.79–1.39)
a

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; HR, hazard ratio; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, rate ratio.