Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Nutr. 2013 May 22;33:10.1146/annurev-nutr-112912-095300. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-112912-095300

Table 4.

Studies evaluating postdiagnosis dietary fat subtypes in relation to breast cancer and all-cause mortalitya

Reference Location Design Sample (n) Dietary
assessment
method
Contrast RR/HR
(95% CI) for
breast cancer
mortality
RR/HR for
all-cause
mortality
Covariates

Saturated fat (SF)/animal fat

Rohan et al. 1993 (50) Australia Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
412 cases
Age: 20–74 years
112 breast cancer
deaths
FFQ SF(g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.65 (0.73–3.75) Not available Energy, age at
menarche, BMI

Holmes et al. 1999 (25) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
1,982 women
with invasive
breast cancer
FFQ Animal fat (g)
Quintile
5versus 1
Not available 1.01 (0.73–1.38) Age, diet interval,
calendar year of
diagnosis, BMI,
oral contraceptive
use, menopausal
status, HRT,
smoking, age at
first birth and
parity, number of
metastatic lymph
nodes, tumor
size, energy
SF(g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.23 (0.89–1.69)

Goodwin et al. 2003 (22) Canada Prospective
cohort study
477 women with
surgically
resected breast
cancer
Age <75 years
FFQ Quadratic form:
SF(g/d)
Quintile 1
versus 5
Not available 4.3 (p = 0.10) Age, energy, BMI,
tumor and nodule
stage, adjuvant
hormone therapy,
adjuvant
chemotherapy

Beasley et al. 2011 (9) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
4,441 women
with history of
invasive breast
cancer and no
history of
recurrence
Age: 29–70 years
525 deaths; 26%
due to breast
cancer
FFQ SF (% energy)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.55 (0.88–2.75) 1.41 (1.06–1.87) Age, state of
residence,
menopausal
status, smoking,
disease stage,
alcohol, history of
HRT, energy,
treatment, BMI,
and physical
activity

Trans fats

Holmes et al. 1999 (25) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
1,982 women
with invasive
breast cancer
FFQ 18:2 trans fat (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
Not available 1.45 (1.06–1.99) Age, diet interval,
calendar year of
diagnosis, BMI,
oral contraceptive
use, menopausal
status, HRT,
smoking, age at
first birth and
parity, number of
metastatic lymph
nodes, tumor
size, energy

Beasley et al. 2011 (9) United
States
Prospective
cohort
4,441 women
with history of
invasive breast
cancer and no
history of
recurrence
Age: 29–70 years
525 deaths; 26%
due to breast
cancer
FFQ Trans fat(%
energy)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.42 (0.80–2.52) 1.78 (1.35–2.32) Age, state of
residence,
menopausal
status, smoking,
disease stage,
alcohol, history of
HRT, energy,
cancer treatment,
BMI, physical
activity

Monounsaturated fat (MUFA)

Rohan et al. 1993 (50) Australia Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
412 cases
Age: 20–74 years
112 breast cancer
deaths
FFQ MUFA intake (g):
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.33 (0.56–3.13) Not available Energy, age at
menarche, BMI

Holmes et al. 1999 (25) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
1,982 women
with invasive
breast cancer
FFQ Oleic acid (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
Not available 1.23 (0.89, 1.70) Age, diet interval,
calendar year of
diagnosis, BMI,
oral contraceptive
use, menopausal
status, HRT,
smoking, age at
first birth and
parity, number of
metastatic lymph
nodes, tumor
size, energy
MUFA (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.34 (0.96–1.86)

Goodwin et al. 2003 (22) Canada Prospective
cohort study
477 women with
surgically
resected breast
cancer
Age <75 years
FFQ Quadratic form:
Oleic acid (g/d)
Quintile 1
versus 5
Not available 3.1 (p = 0.03) Age, energy, BMI,
tumor and nodule
stage, HRT,
adjuvant
chemotherapy

Beasley et al. 2011 (9) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
4,441 women
with history of
invasive breast
cancer and no
history of
recurrence
Age: 29–70 years
525 deaths; 26%
due to breast
cancer
FFQ MUFA
(% energy)
Quintile 5
versus 1
0.89(0.49–1.60) 1.14 (0.86–1.52) Age, state of
residence,
menopausal
status, smoking,
disease stage,
alcohol, history of
HRT, energy,
treatment, BMI,
physical activity

Polyunsaturated fat (PUFA)

Nomura et al. 1991 (43) United
States
(Hawaii)
Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
161 Caucasian
Age: 45–74 years
Diet history
interview
High versus low
PUFA intake
1.72 (0.74–4.00) Not available Disease stage,
menopausal
status, obesity
index, estrogen
use

Rohan et al. 1993 (50) Australia Prospective
cohort study
(follow-up of
cases from a
case-control
study)
412 cases
Age: 20–74 years
112 breast cancer
deaths
FFQ PUFA intake (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.57 (0.78–3.14) Not available Energy, age at
menarche, BMI

Holmes et al. 1999 (25) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
1,982 women
with invasive
breast cancer
686
premenopausal
1,267
postmenopausal
FFQ Omega-3 FA (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
Not available 0.77 (0.56–1.07) Age, diet interval,
calendar year of
diagnosis, BMI,
oral contraceptive
use, menopausal
status, HRT,
smoking, age at
first birth and
parity, number of
metastatic lymph
nodes, tumor
size, energy
LA(g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.05 (0.77–1.44)
EPA(g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
0.78 (0.57–1.07)
PUFA (g)
Quintile 5
versus 1
1.05 (0.77–1.43)

Goodwin et al. 2003 (22) Canada Prospective
cohort study
477 women with
surgically
resected Tl to
T3, NO/1, MO
breast cancer
Age <75 years
FFQ Quadratic form:
LA(g/d)
Quintile 1
versus 5
Not available 1.3 (p = 0.59) Age, energy, BMI,
tumor and nodule
stage, HRT,
adjuvant
chemotherapy

Beasley et al. 2011 (9) United
States
Prospective
cohort study
4,441 women
with history of
invasive breast
cancer and no
history of
recurrence
Age: 29–70 years
525 deaths; 26%
due to breast
cancer
FFQ PUFA
(% energy)
Quintile 5
versus 1
0.90 (0.52–1.55) 0.91 (0.70–1.19) Age, state of
residence,
menopausal
status, smoking,
disease stage,
alcohol, history of
HRT, energy,
treatment, BMI,
physical activity
Patterson et al. 2011
(45)
United
States
Prospective
cohort study
(cohort
analysis from
RCT)
3,081 women
diagnosed and
treated for
early-stage
breast cancer
Age: 18–70 years
24-hour
recalls
EPA and DHA
(mg/day)
Not available Age, obesity,
physical activity,
intervention
group, entry
cohort
Food only:
Tertile 3 versus 1
0.59 (0.43–0.82)
Food adjusted for
supplements:
Tertile 3 versus 1
0.60 (0.44–0.83)
Food plus
supplements:
Tertile 3 versus 1
0.68 (0.51–0.90)
a

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; FA, fatty acid; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; HR, hazard ratio; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; LA, linoleic acid; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, rate ratio.