Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 14;12:105. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-105

Table 1.

Correlation summary between WTI and PWS at baseline

Patient Nodes   TP1-TP2
 
Nodes   TP2-TP3
 
Nodes   TP3-TP4
 
  p   r   p   r   p   r
P1
800
0.0000
0.6048
800
0.0019
0.0972
 
 
 
P2
800
0.0000
0.2946
900
0.0000
0.0889
900
0.1063
−0.0508
P3
700
0.0000
0.1222
800
0.0014
0.0573
800
0.0042
0.0904
P4
700
0.0000
0.1512
700
0.6773
−0.0108
 
 
 
P5
900
0.0000
0.1889
900
0.0066
0.0600
 
 
 
P6
800
0.0020
0.0449
800
0.0000
0.1304
800
0.1876
−0.0249
P7
700
0.1892
0.0160
400
0.3004
0.0266
 
 
 
P8
400
0.8234
0.0049
900
0.0038
0.0536
 
 
 
P9
700
0.0053
0.0422
700
0.3353
−0.0258
 
 
 
P10
400
0.0279
0.0244
 
 
 
 
 
 
P11
800
0.0080
0.0519
900
0.1847
−0.0228
 
 
 
P12
800
0.0000
0.1727
800
0.0633
0.0323
800
0.0655
0.0477
P13
600
0.0000
0.2123
600
0.8811
0.0051
500
0.0000
0.3827
P14
700
0.2534
−0.0199
700
0.1829
0.0393
600
0.0149
−0.0793
P15
1000
0.3021
−0.0162
1000
0.0006
0.0644
 
 
 
P16
900
0.1409
−0.0446
800
0.0000
0.1858
800
0.0001
0.1129
All
T1-T2
0.0000
0.0570
T2-T3
0.0000
0.0498
T3-T4
0.0130
0.0283
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
P=22
 
16 pairs
P=11
 
15 pairs
P= 8
 
7 pairs
P=3
N=1
 
 
N=0
 
 
N=0
 
 
N=1
NS=15     NS=5     NS=7     NS=3

P=Positive; N=Negative; NS=No Significance.

Bold faced cases are cases of statistical significance.