Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;22(10):2889–2897. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0416-7

Table 3.

PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales from: (A). CKD child self-report, (B). parent/proxy reports (main caregivers), (C). “second” parent/proxy reports

Physical functioning Emotional functioning Social functioning School functioning Overall HRQoL
(A). children, n = 171
CT, n = 118 78.13 (63.28−7.5) 65.0 (55.0−80.0) 80.0 (60.0−90.5) 65.0 (50.0−75.0) 71.74 (58.15−80.98)
CKD 2–3, n = 75 78.13 (60.94−87.50) 65 (55−77.5) 80.0 (60−100) 65.0 (50−80) 69.02 (57.07−81.52)
CKD 4–5, n = 43 78.13 (65.63−84.38) 65.0 (55−80) 80.0 (65−93.75) 65.0 (55−70) 72.83 (60.87−79.08)
HD, n = 22 40.63 (18.75−65.63) 52.5 (35.0−75.0) 67.5 (50.0−80.0) 47.5 (35.0−65.0) 50.54 (40.22−64.13)
PD, n = 31 62.5 (50.0−75.0) 70.0 (56.25−73.75) 70.0 (50.0−90.0) 62.5 (50.0−75.0) 64.13 (51.09−75.0)
p value 0.001 ab 0.11 0.02 a 0.07 0.001 b
(B). Parents/main caregivers, n = 201
CT, n = 136 75.00 (53.13−84.38) 65.0 (51.25−75.0) 75.0 (60.0−93.75) 60.0 (45.0−70.0) 66.3 (51.63−76.09)
CKD 2–3, n = 85 75.00 (50.0–87.5) 65.0 (55.0–80.0) 75.0 (60.0–95.0) 60.0 (45.0−70.0) 67.94 (51.09−78.26)
CKD 4–5, n = 51 71.88 (58.59–81.25) 60.0 (50.0–70.0) 70.0 (55.0–86.25) 55.0 (45.0–65.0) 65.22 (54.08–75.0)
HD, n = 24 51.56 (20.31–68.75) 50.0 (37.5–65.0) 62.5 (45.0–85.0) 40.0 (35.0–60.0) 49.46 (40.22–62.5)
PD, n = 41 56.24 (40.63–62.5) 55.0 (40.0–70.0) 55.0 (40.0–70.0) 55.0 (35.0–65.0) 54.35 (38.87–64.13)
p value <0.0001 a 0.006 a 0.0003 a 0.03 c 0.0001 a,d
(C). “Second” parents n = 84
CT, n = 61 75.00 (56.25–84.38) 60.0 (53.75–80.0) 80.0 (63.75–95.0) 65.0.0 (50.0–75.0) 66.67 (53.26–79.62)
CKD 2–3 n = 39 78.13 (56.26–84.38) 65.0 (60.0–80.0) 80.0 (70.0–95.0) 70.0 (50.0–75.0) 69.05 (59.5–80.44)
CKD 4–5, n = 22 71.88 (53.13–81.25) 55.0 (45.0–60.0) 72.5 (60.0–80.0) 60.0 (50.0–75.0) 65.76 (50.0–73.91)
HD + PD n = 23 53.13 (41.41–67.97) 55.0 (41.25–68.75) 65.0 (56.25–80.0) 55.0 (40–65) 56.53 (49.18–63.04)
p value 0.006 e 0.06f, 0.02 h 0.09 0.08 0.002 g

Data were shown as median values and quartiles (first—third quartile). CT children on conservative treatment, HD children on haemodialysis, PD children on peritoneal dialysis

For children: aCT versus PD and HD; b HD versus PD and CT. For parents/main caregivers: aCT versus PD and HD; cCT versus HD; d PD versus HD. For “second” parents: eCT versus HD + PD; f CT versus HD + PD; gCT versus HD + PD; hCKD2–3 versus CKD4–5. Statistically significant differences are in bold (p < 0.05)