Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;76(5):725–733. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12092

Table 4.

Stages of the model-building process to reach the final pharmacokinetic model of melatonin in the combined dataset

Parameter Base model (WT-power allometric; full covariance matrix) Reduced base model (shared variance model) Intermediate model (Gender-prop on V) Final model (Gender-prop on V; Race-exp on CL and V)
Observations 46 46 46 46
Patients 16 16 16 16
MOFV 381.97 381.97 378.05 360.91
P value 0.047* 3.48 × 10−5*
CL (l h−1) 0.02 0.020 (0.39) 0.021 (0.37) 0.021 (0.63)
V (l) 0.75 0.75 (0.14) 0.64 (0.14) 0.74 (0.08)
t1/2 (h) 26.10 26.10 21.10 24.30
θgender 0.47 (0.67) 1.73 (0.20)
θrace 1.09 (0.13)
ωCL (CV%) 111.80 111.90 (0.47) 103.0 (0.48) 111.90 (0.75)
CorrCL,V 0.999
ωV (CV%) 51.70
θCorr 0.46 (0.26) 0.47 (0.26) 0.215 (0.57)
σprop (CV%) 24.90 24.90 (0.29) 24.40 (0.30) 22.90 (0.29)

Parameters are presented as mean parameter estimate (CV% in the estimate). MOFV: Minimum value of objective function; ΔMOFV indicates a change in MOFV relative to the previous model; *ΔMOFV of −3.84 is significant at P < 0.05 (1 d.f.). Weight (WT) is scaled to a median of 0.867 kg; θrace: fractional difference from θCL and θV at a certain value of Race; θgender: fractional difference from θV at a certain gender value; ω: Inter-individual variability; CorrCL,V: correlation between CL and V variability parameters; θCorr: shared variance between CL and V; σ: residual variability.