Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 1;3(12):4253–4264. doi: 10.1002/ece3.781

Table 3.

Results of the linear mixed effects model on the ratio of males per female. There was no correlation structure necessary, but a varExp correction for heterogeneity was improving the model. The data (n = 5) were not transformed and “Day” was used as fixed effect. The ratios of males per female were significantly higher in the high-salt population. Over time the ratios declined in both treatments (Fig. 2B). In the model Ma/Fem is the comparison between high-salt and food-limited populations to normal-COMCO populations

Estimate SE df t-Value P-value
Ma/FemCP 0.1151 0.0244 102 4.7146 0.0000***
Day × Ma/FemCP −0.0018 0.0006 102 −3.1128 0.0024**
Ma/FemFP 0.0640 0.0717 12 0.8932 0.3893
Ma/FemSP 0.8022 0.1147 12 6.9913 0.0000***
Day × Ma/FemFP −0.0002 0.0019 102 −0.0972 0.9227
Day × Ma/FemSP −0.0057 0.0034 102 −1.6625 0.0995

Ma/Fem = ratio of males per female.

SP, high-salt population; FP, food-limited population; CP, Normal-COMBO populations.

***0, **0.001, *0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 1.