Table 3.
Results of the linear mixed effects model on the ratio of males per female. There was no correlation structure necessary, but a varExp correction for heterogeneity was improving the model. The data (n = 5) were not transformed and “Day” was used as fixed effect. The ratios of males per female were significantly higher in the high-salt population. Over time the ratios declined in both treatments (Fig. 2B). In the model Ma/Fem is the comparison between high-salt and food-limited populations to normal-COMCO populations
Estimate | SE | df | t-Value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ma/FemCP | 0.1151 | 0.0244 | 102 | 4.7146 | 0.0000*** |
Day × Ma/FemCP | −0.0018 | 0.0006 | 102 | −3.1128 | 0.0024** |
Ma/FemFP | 0.0640 | 0.0717 | 12 | 0.8932 | 0.3893 |
Ma/FemSP | 0.8022 | 0.1147 | 12 | 6.9913 | 0.0000*** |
Day × Ma/FemFP | −0.0002 | 0.0019 | 102 | −0.0972 | 0.9227 |
Day × Ma/FemSP | −0.0057 | 0.0034 | 102 | −1.6625 | 0.0995 |
Ma/Fem = ratio of males per female.
SP, high-salt population; FP, food-limited population; CP, Normal-COMBO populations.
***0, **0.001, *0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 1.