Table 2. Model validation of receptive field analysis.
AI (relative surround strength) | AI (center time to peak) | |||||||
mean | std | p | skew | mean | std | p | skew | |
Standard model | −0.02 | 0.06 | .004 | −1.10 | − 0.0003 | 0.002 | .04 | − 4.70 |
Small surround weight | −0.06 | 0.13 | < .0001 | −0.12 | − 0.0003 | 0.002 | .04 | − 4.69 |
Large surround weight | −0.05 | 0.26 | .08 | −2.44 | − 0.0014 | 0.004 | .0003 | − 2.66 |
Small surround radius | − 0.01 | 0.08 | .19 | −4.56 | −0.0009 | 0.003 | .0007 | −2.49 |
Large surround radius | −0.02 | 0.05 | <.0001 | −0.24 | −0.0005 | 0.002 | .01 | −3.71 |
Adaptation index (AI) in surround strength and center latency for different non-adapting control models. Columns labeled “mean,” “std,” and “skew” show the mean, standard deviation, and skewness of the adaptation indices for the indicated analysis; columns labeled “p” show the from of each distribution against the null hypothesis of zero mean. Standard model: Surround radii (relative to center radii) had mean 2 and standard deviation 0.3; surround weights (relative to center weights) had mean 1 and standard deviation 0.1. Small surround weight: Surround weights had mean 0.5; all other parameters were the same as in the standard model. Large surround weight: Surround weights had mean 2. Small surround radius: Surround radii had mean 1. Large surround radius: Surround radii had mean 3.