Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;9(12):e1003344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003344

Table 2. Model validation of receptive field analysis.

AI (relative surround strength) AI (center time to peak)
mean std p skew mean std p skew
Standard model −0.02 0.06 .004 −1.10 − 0.0003 0.002 .04 − 4.70
Small surround weight −0.06 0.13 < .0001 −0.12 − 0.0003 0.002 .04 − 4.69
Large surround weight −0.05 0.26 .08 −2.44 − 0.0014 0.004 .0003 − 2.66
Small surround radius − 0.01 0.08 .19 −4.56 −0.0009 0.003 .0007 −2.49
Large surround radius −0.02 0.05 <.0001 −0.24 −0.0005 0.002 .01 −3.71

Adaptation index (AI) in surround strength and center latency for different non-adapting control models. Columns labeled “mean,” “std,” and “skew” show the mean, standard deviation, and skewness of the adaptation indices for the indicated analysis; columns labeled “p” show the Inline graphic from Inline graphic of each distribution against the null hypothesis of zero mean. Standard model: Surround radii (relative to center radii) had mean 2 and standard deviation 0.3; surround weights (relative to center weights) had mean 1 and standard deviation 0.1. Small surround weight: Surround weights had mean 0.5; all other parameters were the same as in the standard model. Large surround weight: Surround weights had mean 2. Small surround radius: Surround radii had mean 1. Large surround radius: Surround radii had mean 3.