Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;9(12):e1003357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003357

Figure 2. Cell-to-cell variability of kinase cascades with negative feedback.

Figure 2

A Schematic representation of the five-step cascade with negative feedback acting upstream (red, solid) or downstream (red, dashed). Inline graphic either activates the phosphatase of the second or the fifth level. B Cell-to-cell variability simulations confirm that negative feedback eliminates the variability of the pathway sensitivity (concepts similar to Figure 1B). Strong feedback was assumed and simulations were performed using Eq. 9 (parameters same as in Figure 1B; Supplemental Table S1). Colored box plots represent the Inline graphic and Inline graphic distribution of the feedback model, while gray box plots show the behavior of the reference feedback-less cascade (cf. Figure 1B). The inset shows that increasing the feedback cooperativity parameter Inline graphic (Eq. 8) decreases Inline graphic variability, measured as IQRatio (cf. Figure 1C). CD Negative feedback abrogates the trade-off in Inline graphic and Inline graphic invariance. Cell-to-cell variability simulations (similar to panel B) were repeated for various parameter configurations for models with upstream feedback (C) or downstream feedback (D): activation resistances in the cascade were tuned by simultaneously changing the phosphatase rate constants Inline graphic (x-axis). The variabilities of Inline graphic and Inline graphic were analyzed using the IQRatio as in Figure 1C, and similar results are obtained using the coefficient of variation (Figure S2). Inline graphic was defined as the stimulus for a half-maximal pathway activation. The behavior of a feedback model with limited feedback strength (Inline graphic ; thick, solid lines) is compared to a feedback-less model (Inline graphic; thin, dashed lines) and to a model with very strong feedback Inline graphic; thin, solid lines). Simulations for moderate feedback strength (thick lines) were performed by numerically integrating the ODE systems (Eqs. 8 and 12), while the strong feedback calculations (thin solid lines) were done using analytical approximations (Eqs. 9 and 13).