Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 20;28(8):789–798. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs118

Table 1.

Smoker cohort sample characteristics in Mexico and Uruguay, 2008 and 2010

Charcteristics Mexico
Uruguay
2008 2010 2008 2010
(n = 1760) (n = 1840) (n = 1379) (n = 1411)
Sex
    Female 38% 38% 51% 51%
    Male 62% 62% 49% 49%
Age
    18–24 18% 17% 19% 17%
    25–39 37% 36% 33% 33%
    40–54 28% 29% 30% 31%
    55 or older 16% 18% 19% 19%
Education
    <Middle school 28% 31% 25% 23%
    Middle school 29% 30% 36% 32%
    High School 27% 24% 22% 26%
    >High School 17% 15% 17% 19%
Incomea
    Low 25% 28% 17% 8%
    Middle–low 24% 24% 21% 13%
    Midde–high 20% 21% 27% 25%
    High 19% 20% 27% 43%c
    Missing 12% 7% 8% 11%
Smoking behaviourb
    Non-daily 32% 28% 8% 8%
    Low daily consumption 38% 37% 41% 39%
    High daily consumption 24% 20% 44% 40%
    Quitter 7% 15% 6% 13%
Cities
    Capital cityc 23% 23% 71% 71%
    Other cities 77% 77% 29% 29%
SHS exposure
 Workplace
        Did not work in enclosed workplace 42% 45% 28% 25%
        No SHS exposure in last month 45% 43% 57% 58%
        SHS exposure in last month 13% 12% 15% 17%
 Restaurant
        Did not go to restaurant in last month 73% 73% 70% 71%
        No SHS exposure in last visit 14% 19% 27% 26%
        SHS exposure in last visit 13% 8% 3% 3%
 Bar
        Did not go to bar in last month 79% 82% 74% 78%
        No SHS exposure in last visit 7% 7% 20% 17%
        SHS exposure in last visit 14% 11% 6% 5%

From 2008 to 2010, 74% (1309/1760) of the Mexican cohort and 70.4% (971/1379) of the Uruguay cohort were followed, with replacements in 2010 (n = 531 in Mexico; n = 440 in Uruguay) recruited from same geographical units.

aIncome higher in 2010 than in 2008 for Uruguay, P < 0.001.

bHigher percentage of quitters in 2010 than in 2008, in both Uruguay and Mexico, P < 0.001.

cCapital city = Mexico City for Mexico and Montevideo for Uruguay.