Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e73623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073623

Table 2. Results of regression analyses for the hedging scores per 100 words.

Hedging score per 100 words
No industry support Industry support Difference
Unadjusted (n = 284) 3.54 (3.37–3.71) 2.66 (2.37–2.94) 0.88 (0.55–1.22)
Fully adjusted (n = 231) 0.53 (0.06–1.00)
-Journals
British Journal of Psychiatry 1.91 (0.43–3.40)
British Medical Journal 1.46 (0.32–2.61)
Annals of Family Medicine 1.92 (0.84–2.99)
Not adjusted for P-value (n = 284) 0.61 (0.15–1.07)
-Journals
Heart 1.31 (0.14–2.47)
Pediatrics 1.22 (0.07–2.24)
British Medical Journal 1.58 (0.44–2.71)
Annals of Family Medicine 1.96 (0.88–3.04)

Journal differed significantly from New England Journal of Medicine (reference category).

Full adjustment was for Randomized Controlled Trial (yes/no), quality (high/non-high), sample size (6 categories), journal (28 dummies), magnitude of the P-value (3 categories).