Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;7(12):e2572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002572

Table 3. Risk at water contact points for S. mansoni infection.

Jenipapo (n = 461) Volta do Rio (n = 352)
Infected (%) Not-Infected OR (95% CI) p-value Infected (%) Not-Infected OR (95% CI) p-value
Contact point n = 211 n = 250 n = 124 n = 230
1 45 (21.3) 27 (10.8) 1.42 (0.77–2.62) 0.292 52 (41.9) 21 (9.1) 2.97 (1.44–6.11) 0.001
2 69 (32.7) 50 (20.0) 1.39 (0.83–2.30) 0.182 48 (38.7) 33 (14.3) 1.84 (0.97–3.49) 0.075
3 31 (14.7) 14 (5.6) * 41 (33.1) 12 (5.2) 3.60 (1.49–8.72) 0.004
4 184 (87.2) 215 (86.0) * 76 (61.3) 126 (54.8) *
5 110 (52.1) 74 (29.6) 2.27 (1.52–3.39) <0.001 15 (12.1) 10 (4.3) *
6 49 (23.2) 37 (14.8) * 17 (13.7) 9 (3.9) *
7 11 (5.2) 9 (3.6) * 37 (29.8) 55 (23.9) *
8 - - - 8 (6.5) 9 (3.9) *
Other 16 (7.6) 13 (5.2) * 18 (14.5) 17 (7.4) 2.05 (0.90–4.66) 0.091

Reported use of a water contact point (see Figure 1) was entered into a logistic regression model where the dependent variable was S. mansoni infection status. The model was controlled for age and sex.

* Indicates contact points that did not enter the model. Statistically significant comparisons are in bold type.