Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 24;58(20):10.1088/0031-9155/58/20/7209. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/20/7209

Figure 3.

Figure 3

PH20 (a) analytic and (b) Monte Carlo simulated projections; and LEHR (c) analytic and (d) Monte Carlo simulated projections. The PH20 analytic projection contains 30% more counts than in (b), whereas (c) contains 30% fewer counts than in (d). The latter discrepancy is, in part, explained by the use of hexagonal instead of circular holes in the collimator geometry of the MC simulations.