Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;8(12):e82052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082052

Figure 3. Meta analysis of the RGT data.

Figure 3

This analysis is based on 12 distinct experiments (n  =  228) using the same protocol. It reveals a bimodal distribution of RGT scores (% of favourable choices during the last 20 min) with a majority of good decision makers (good DM, with scores above 70%), a minority of poor decision makers (poor DM, with scores below 30%) and the remaining, undecided rats with intermediate scores.