Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 2;121(11-12):1299–1305. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205350

Table 4.

Estimated mean percent change in AFC by urinary paraben concentration tertile based on the Poisson regression model.

Paraben concentration (μg/L) n Estimated mean percent change in AFC (95% CI) p-Value
MP
Tertile 3 (381–2,428) 47 –10.6 (–28.2, 11.2) 0.31
Tertile 2 (145–377) 48 –6.8 (–23.5, 13.7) 0.49
Tertile 1 (5.13–132) 47 0 (Reference)
ptrend 0.31
PP
Tertile 3 (87.8–727) 47 –16.3 (–30.8, 1.3) 0.07
Tertile 2 (26.3–81.8) 48 –5.0 (–23.7, 18.4) 0.65
Tertile 1 (< LOD–25.2) 47 0 (Reference)
ptrend 0.07
BP
Tertile 3 (5.44–177) 48 –2.0 (–21.0, 21.6) 0.86
Tertile 2 (0.75–5.12) 47 –4.8 (–22.5, 16.8) 0.63
Tertile 1 (< LOD–0.73) 47 0 (Reference)
ptrend 0.86
All model results were adjusted for age; paraben concentrations were SG-corrected. LODs were 1.0 μg/L for MP and 0.2 μg/L for PP and BP.