Table 1.

Prevalence of membership in microfinance programmes among the survey participants divided by response and non-response to the IPV question and displayed by age, residence, education, religion, sex of household head and household wealth index

	Respondents to IPV questions		Non-respondents to IPV questions		Total
	N	Per cent	N	Per cent	N	Per cent
Age
15–19	462	29	886	23	1348	26
20–24	850	36	1323	31	2174	33
25–29	866	43	1068	37	1935	40
30–34	742	40	918	39	1661	39
35–39	701	41	895	41	1596	41
40–44	462	42	756	38	1218	40
45–49	380	36	684	35	1064	35
Residence
Urban	1688	36	2482	33	4151	34
Rural	2795	40*	4048	36	6845	37
Education
No education	1494	45	2030	40	3525	41
Primary	1348	44	1920	40	3268	42
Secondary	1292	31	2051	29	3345	30
Higher	327	19	528	19	855	19
Religion
Muslim	4033	38	5889	34	9924	36
Non-Muslim	430	48	641	41	1072	44
Household head
Female	505	25	802	26	1308	25
Male	3958	40*	5728	36	9688	37
Wealth index
Poorest	804	47	971	41	1175	43
Poorer	856	45	1138	42	1995	43
Middle	849	42	1246	40	2095	41
Richer	855	41	1345	37	2201	38
Richest	1099	23	1830	22	2930	22
Total	4465	39*	6531	35	10 993	36

χ² Tests test for differences in distribution of microfinance programme membership between the respondents and the non-respondents to IPV questions.

Significance for χ² test is denoted by * (p<0.05, Bonferroni corrected for 22 comparisons in each column).

IPV, intimate partner violence.