Table 6.
Adiposity Volume a | Measurement Method | Predictive Models | R2 (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Total abdominal | Traditional b,c,d | − 470.28 + 7.10 Waist e − 91.01 Gender + 5.74 SD e | 89.9 |
Stereovision f | − 645.08 + 12.97 COD e + 3.79 sHip e − 61.37 Gender + 3.89 sWaist e | 84.2 | |
Combination g | − 470.28 + 7.10 Waist e − 91.01 Gender + 5.74 SD e | 89.9 | |
Subcutaneous | Traditional b,c | − 204.92 + 8.82 Waist e − 86.07 Gender − 409.19 WHR e | 88.6 |
Stereovision f | − 827.48 + 7.43 sHip e + 7.02 COW e | 79.3 | |
Combination d,g | − 172.37 + 8.57 Waist e − 62.65 Gender − 450.16 sWHR e | 90.4 | |
Visceral | Traditional b,c | − 214.28 + 306.03 WHR e + 5.78 SD e − 1.34 Waist | 54.2 |
Stereovision d,f | − 96.76 + 11.48 COD e − 5.09 COW e + 204.74 sWHR e − 18.59 Gender | 71.7 | |
Combination g | − 96.76 + 11.48 COD e − 5.09 COW e + 204.74 sWHR e − 18.59 Gender | 71.7 |
Dependent variable measured by magnetic resonance imaging
Manual
Independent variables include gender, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, sagittal diameter
Optimal model for predicting central obesity by stepwise multiple regression analysis
Waist, waist circumference; SD, sagittal diameter; COD, central obesity depth; sHip, stereovision body imaging hip circumference; sWaist, stereovision body imaging waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; COW, central obesity width; sWHR, stereovision body imaging waist-to-hip ratio
Independent variables include gender, stereovision body imaging waist circumference, stereovision body imaging hip circumferences, stereovision body imaging waist-to-hip ratio, central obesity depth, central obesity width
Independent variables include gender, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, sagittal diameter, stereovision body imaging waist circumference, stereovision body imaging hip circumferences, stereovision body imaging waist-to-hip ratio, central obesity depth, central obesity width