Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5025a. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5025a

Table 4.

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated with Lung Recurrence after Resection of CLM

Factor 3-year Lung
RFS (%)
Univariate
Analysis
P Value
Multivariate Analysis

P
Value
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Disease-free intervala
  <12 months (n=130) 52.7 0.680
  ≥12 months (n=63) 59.7
Primary tumor location
  Rectum (n=39) 34.3 0.016 0.069
  Colon (n=154) 59.4
Primary tumor nodal status
  Positive (n=133) 52.8 0.511
  Negative (n=60) 59.7
RAS mutation status
  Mutant (n=34) 34.6 <0.001 0.01 2.01 (1.20 – 3.41)
  Wild-type (n=159) 59.3
No. of cycles of preoperative chemotherapy
  >6 (n=65) 54.6 0.976
  ≤6 (n=128) 55.9
Pathologic response
  %VTC ≥50% (n=87) 39.7 0.001 0.009 1.91 (1.17 – 3.10)
  %VTC <50% (n=106) 64.5
No. of CLM
  Multiple (n=125) 50.3 0.062 NS
  Single (n=68) 66
Diameter of largest of CLM
  >5 cm (n=24) 45.5 0.04 NS
  ≥5 cm (n=169) 56.4
Major complication
  Yes (n=32) 34.2 0.164
  No (n=161) 57.7
Surgical margin
  Positive (n=19) 81.3 0.295
  Negative (n=174) 73.1

CLM indicates colorectal liver metastases; NS, not significant; RFS, recurrence-free survival; %VTC, percentage viable tumor cells.

a

From diagnosis of primary tumor to diagnosis of CLM.