Table 1.
Method | AAF reduction | Reproducibility | Labor inputa | Batch processingb | Main drawbacks | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LED array | Excellent | Excellent | Non-intensive | Yes | Long treatment time for thicker sections | This report |
UV and fluorescent lights | Good | Good | Non-intensive | Yes | Narrow spectral range may not reduce AAFs in different spectrum | Neumann and Gabel (2002), Schnell et al. (1999) |
Sudan Black | Moderate | Moderate | Moderately intensive | No | Diminish fluorescence intensity of labels, does not mask AAFs across entire spectrum | Oliveira et al. (2010), Viegas et al. (2007) |
Cupric sulfate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderately intensive | No | Incompatible with Qdot® fluorophores | Potter et al. (2012), Zarkowsky et al. (2011) |
Sodium borohydrate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderately intensive | No | Chemical hazard, bubbling action may cause tissue damage | Clancy and Cauller (1998) |
Preparing and processing reagents, specimens, and instrument.
Multiple specimens per treatment.