Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Aug 27;220(1):10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.018. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.018

Table 1.

Survey of autofluorescence reduction methods: advantages and disadvantages.

Method AAF reduction Reproducibility Labor inputa Batch processingb Main drawbacks References
LED array Excellent Excellent Non-intensive Yes Long treatment time for thicker sections This report
UV and fluorescent lights Good Good Non-intensive Yes Narrow spectral range may not reduce AAFs in different spectrum Neumann and Gabel (2002), Schnell et al. (1999)
Sudan Black Moderate Moderate Moderately intensive No Diminish fluorescence intensity of labels, does not mask AAFs across entire spectrum Oliveira et al. (2010), Viegas et al. (2007)
Cupric sulfate Moderate Moderate Moderately intensive No Incompatible with Qdot® fluorophores Potter et al. (2012), Zarkowsky et al. (2011)
Sodium borohydrate Moderate Moderate Moderately intensive No Chemical hazard, bubbling action may cause tissue damage Clancy and Cauller (1998)
a

Preparing and processing reagents, specimens, and instrument.

b

Multiple specimens per treatment.