Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 26;4(4):102–110. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v4.i4.102

Table 1.

Comparison of leading mass spectrometers for lipidomics

Resolution Mass range(m/z) Mass accuracy(ppm)
ToF 2-5 typical
Waters LCT premier 10000 18000 NA
Agilent LC/ToF > 22000 50-20000 < 1
Bruker microToF 10000 3000 NA
QToF Same as ToF
Agilent 6540 > 40000 50-10000 < 1
Waters QToF ultima 17500 32000 1
Waters QToF micro 5000 20000 1
Bruker max is 4G > 60000 10000 < 1
LTQ velos 3000 4000 0.1 Da
LTQ-orbitrap velos > 100000 4000 < 2
TSQ quantum access max 0.4 (FWHM) 3000 0.1 Da
TSQ quantiva 0.2 (FWHM) 1850 0.1 Da
Q-exactive 140000 6000 < 1
Orbitrap fusion tribrid 450000 4000 < 1
Synapt G2-HDMS 40000 32000 (1000001) < 1
Synapt G2S-HDMS 20000 32000 (1000001) Approx- imately 2
1

When fitted with a quadrupole. m/z: Mass to charge ratio, ppm: Parts per million; LCT: Liquid chromatograph; LTQ: Linear trap quadropole; TSQ: Triple stage quadrupole; HDMS: High definition mass spectrometry; FWHM: Full width at half maximum; ToF: Time of flight; NA: Not available.