Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2013 May 5;37(5):10.1002/gepi.21728. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21728

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of three effect size models. Panel A shows 3 settings to determine the effect size of variants as a function of the variants’ MAF. Different effect sizes are adjusted to keep total heritability constant with h2=20%, where h2=Var(Xβ)Var(Xβ)+σ2, and genotype matrix X comes from 1000G whole-genome exome-sequencing data. As X and h2 are fixed, effect size vector β is proportional to σ along different MAF. Panel B shows the MAF distribution of the 1000G genotype data set.