. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Crim Justice. 2013 September-October;41(5):10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.014. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.014

Table A.2.

Model Rule-breaking Wave 1

		Overall fit			Model difference test

		−2LL	Df	AIC	χ²	Δdf	P

1	Saturated (means constrained)	2646.51	1183	280.51
2	ACE	2661.99	1196	269.99	15.48	13	0.28
3	ACE M=F	2680.19	1199	282.19	33.68	16	0.01
4	AE M=F	2684.34	1200	284.34	37.83	17	<0.01
5	AE M≠F	2674.26	1198	278.26	27.75	15	0.02
6	CE M=F	2700.12	1200	300.12	53.61	17	<0.01
7	CE M≠F	2685.62	1198	289.62	39.11	15	<0.01
8	E	2886.13	1201	484.13	239.62	18	<0.01
9	Male ACE, female CE	2662.40	1197	268.40	15.89	14	0.32

Estimates: male - A 0.48 (0.30–0.63); C 0.17 (0.06–0.31); E 0.35 (0.27–0.45); female - C 0.62 (0.54–0.69); E:0.38 (0.31–0.46)