Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 8;86(1032):20130515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130515

Table 3.

Dose comparison of the ipsilateral lung and the contralateral lung between the three plans (n=12 patients; arithmetical mean)

Parameters 3D-CRT IMRT VMAT 3D-CRT vs IMRT IMRT vs VMAT 3D-CRT vs VMAT
Lung ipsilateral
 Dmean (Gy) 12.097±3.00 12.097±3.00 12.097±3.00 0.320 <0.0001 (****) <0.0001 (****)
 V5 (%) 40.710±11.71 68.317±19.56 94.241±5.63 <0.0001 (****) 0.0002 (***) <0.0001 (****)
 V10 (%) 28.369±6.96 43.461±13.88 70.222±9.91 0.0001 (***) <0.0001 (****) <0.0001 (****)
 V20 (%) 22.486±5.61 19.908±3.45 29.181±9.00 0.072 0.003 (**) 0.008 (**)
 V30 (%) 19.485±5.25 12.965±1.70 14.417±4.18 0.0004 (***) 0.251 0.001 (**)
 V40 (%) 14.637±6.59 5.748±1.63 6.246±2.42 0.0003 (***) 0.544 0.0003 (***)
Lung contralateral
 Dmean (Gy) 0.692±1.23 0.692±1.23 0.692±1.23 0.018 (*) 0.023 (*) 0.008 (**)
 V2 (%) 0.685±1.05 22.960±27.06 81.762±19.60 0.014 (*) <0.0001 (****) <0.0001 (****)
 V5 (%) 0.001±0.003 5.318±9.57 19.512±12.88 0.081 0.005 (**) 0.0003 (***)
 V10 (%) 0.000±0.00 0.893±1.66 0.962±1.278 0.09 0.87 0.024 (*)

3D, three dimensional; CRT, conformal radiotherapy; Dmean, mean dose; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; V10, volume receiving 10 Gy; V2, volume receiving 2 Gy; V20, volume receiving 20 Gy; V30, volume receiving 30 Gy; V40, volume receiving 40 Gy; V5, volume receiving 5 Gy; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy.