Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 17;8:151. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-151

Table 4.

Results of statistical analyses between immunohistochemical and clinicopathologic parameters in cases with gastric carcinoma

Variables iNOS score
D2-40
iNOS-T iNOS-S iNOS-E LID P-LVD I-LVD
Age*
   r value
0.007
0.008
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.01
   p Value
0.92
0.96
0.86
0.71
0.99
0.85
Gender (male or female)**
   p Value
0.67
0.93
0.34
0.84
0.20
0.15
Location of tumor (proximal or distal) **
   p Value
0.53
0.17
0.005
0.95
0.77
0.60
Tumor size (cm)*
   r value
0.31
0.06
0.06
0.29
0.53
0.37
   p Value
0.05
0.70
0.70
0.07
< 0.001
0.01
Histological type (NOS/tubular/papillary or mucinous/poorly cohesive) **
   p Value
0.46
0.54
0.51
0.14
0.44
0.62
Differentiation (Well/moderate or poorly/signet ring cell) **
   p Value
0.01
0.748
0.92
0.001
0.001
0.03
Inflammatory response (score 1 + 2 or score 3) **
   p value
0.01
0.89
0.51
0.02
0.001
0.01
LVI [H&E](positive or negative) **
   p Value
0.002
0.03
0.01
0.001
0.001
< 0.001
LI [D2-40](positive or negative) **
   p Value
0.002
0.02
0.01
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
nLI*
   r value
0.64
0.37
0.44
0.98
0.65
0.63
   p Value
< 0.001
0.017
0.004
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
nNm*
   r value
0.61
0.30
0.40
0.83
0.86
0.78
   p Value
< 0.001
0.05
0.009
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
pN (N0 or N1/2/3) **
   p Value
0.001
0.003
0.023
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
pT (T1 + 2 orT3 + 4) **
   p Value
0.05
0.70
0.70
0.07
< 0.001
0.01
TNM stage (I + II or III + IV) **
   p Value 0.0002 0.067 0.02 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

* Pearson’s correlation analysis/Spearman’s correlation analysis and **Independent sample t test/the Mann–Whitney U tests were used.