Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(4):1125–1131.

Table 4.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence per US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline

FOBT OR (95% CI) CRC screening Adherence OR (95% CI)
Site
 Clinic 2 1.00 1.00
 Clinic 1 0.74 (0.46, 1.19) 0.685 (0.46, 1.02)
Age
 50–64 1.00 1.00
 65–75 0.90 (0.62, 1.29) 1.10 (0.82, 1.48)
Gender
 Male 1.00 1.00
 Female 1.75 (1.21, 2.52) 1.56 (1.17, 2.09)
Insurance
 None 1.00 1.00
 Public 1.99 (1.18, 3.37) 3.02 (1.92, 4.76)
 Private 1.15 (0.60, 2.19) 2.76 (1.63, 4.67)
 (Public vs. Private) 1.73 (1.08, 2.28) 1.10 (0.77, 1.57)
Continuity Index
 1 Visit 1.00 1.00
 Lower 2.75 (1.19, 6.34) 3.22 (1.70, 6.12)
 Higher 3.01 (1.27, 7.14) 3.62 (1.86, 7.05)
 (Higher vs. Lower) 1.09 ( 0.74, 1.60) 1.12 (0.82, 1.54)
Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index
 0 1.00 1.00
 1 1.02 (0.70, 1.49) 0.99 (0.72, 1.37)
 ≥ 2 0.71 (0.36, 1.39) 1.08 (0.65, 1.79)
Provider type and Language Concordance
 None 1.00 1.00
 MD Language Concordant 2.85 (0.59, 13.65) 4.39 (1.15, 16.73)
 MD Language Non-concordant 1.30 (0.28, 6.08) 3.64 ( 0.98, 13.49)
 Non-MD Language Concordant 0.75 (0.16, 3.57) 1.90 (0.51, 7.08)
 Non-MD Language Non-concordant 4.10 (0.87, 13.36) 4.65 (1.23, 17.61)

CRC = colorectal cancer; FOBT = fecal occult blood test; MD = physician