(1) Pure environmental component is higher for active dispersers. |
Within basins |
PARTIAL SUPPORT (fraction highest except in Koutajoki when using overland distances) |
Suggests that, at small spatial extents, the actively dispersing species are more able to track environmental heterogeneity than passively dispersing species. |
Across basins |
SUPPORTED |
Suggests that, at the large spatial extent, actively dispersing species are more able to track environmental heterogeneity than passively dispersing species. |
(2) Pure spatial component is higher for species with aquatic adults. |
Within basins |
NOT SUPPORTED |
In this system, in general, the importance of spatial structuring is so low that it hinders meaningful comparisons between dispersal mode groups. |
Across basins |
NOT SUPPORTED |
See above. |
(3a) Strength of pure environmental control: AcTe > PaTe > PaAq |
Within basins |
PARTIAL SUPPORT (In Koutajoki with overland distances, PaTe had the highest fraction) |
See prediction 1. |
Across basins |
NOT SUPPORTED |
Due to high covariation, the effects of spatial location and environmental factors cannot be distinguished at large spatial extent. |
(3b) Strength of pure spatial control: PaAq > PaTe > AcTe |
Within basins |
NOT SUPPORTED |
See prediction 2. |
Across basins |
NOT SUPPORTED |
See prediction 2. |
(4) Spatial [b + c] fraction should be higher when using watercourse distances compared with overland distances. |
NOT SUPPORTED |
The two distance measures are equally good or poor in the studied system. |
(5a) Environmental structuring should be highest in the drainage basin with the highest environmental heterogeneity (K > I > T) |
NOT SUPPORTED |
Some factor(s) other than the degree of environmental heterogeneity drove the differences among basins. |
(5b) Spatial structuring should be highest in the study area with the largest spatial extent (T > I > K) |
NOT SUPPORTED |
Some factor(s) other than the spatial extent drove the differences among basins. |