Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Open Infect Dis J. 2012 Jan;6:80176398. doi: 10.2174/1874279301206010005

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard Analyses of Time to Emergency Department Use for a Cutaneous Injection-Related Infection Among 306 Female Injection Drug Users

Unadjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR)
Variable HR (95% CI) p-value AHR (95% CI) p-value
Age
 (per year older) 1.00 (0.97 –1.02) 0.738
Unstable housing*
 (Yes vs No) 1.68 (1.09 – 2.61) 0.020 1.12 (0.69 – 1.82) 0.647
DTES residence
 (Yes vs No) 2.46 (1.41 – 4.28) 0.001 2.06 (1.13 – 3.78) 0.019
Require assistance inject*
 (Yes vs No) 1.56 (1.03 – 2.37) 0.038 1.40 (0.92 – 2.13) 0.122
Cocaine injection*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.37 (0.88 – 2.11) 0.163
Heroin injection*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.55 (1.01 – 2.37) 0.044 1.22 (0.79 – 1.90) 0.361
Crack use*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.42 (0.90 – 2.24) 0.131
Speedball injection*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.61 (0.97 – 2.65) 0.064
HIV serostatus
 (Positive vs Negative) 1.01 (0.62 – 1.66) 0.958
Hospital referral
 (Yes vs No) 5.06 (3.14 – 8.17) <0.001 4.48 (2.76 – 7.30) <0.001

Note:

*

Behaviours refer to activities in the last six months.

Indicates data derived from SIF database and by a study nurse. Model was fit adjusted for all variables p < 0.05 in unadjusted analyses.

CI = confidence interval, DTES = Downtown Eastside.