Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Open Infect Dis J. 2012 Jan;6:80176398. doi: 10.2174/1874279301206010005

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard Analyses of Time to Emergency Department Use for a Cutaneous Injection-Related Infection Among 762 Male Injection Drug Users

Unadjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR)
Variable HR (95% CI) p-value AHR (95% CI) p-value
Age
 (per year older) 0.99 (0.97 – 1.01) 0.287
Unstable housing*
 (Yes vs No) 1.60 (1.18 – 2.17) 0.002 1.37 (0.98 – 1.92) 0.06
DTES residence
 (Yes vs No) 1.52 (1.10 – 2.11) 0.012 1.19 (0.83 – 1.72) 0.34
Require assistance inject*
 (Yes vs No) 1.59 (1.16 – 2.17) 0.004 1.38 (1.01 – 1.90) 0.04
Cocaine injection*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.18 (0.87 – 1.60) 0.296
Heroin injection*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.13 (0.85 – 1.51) 0.385
Crack use*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.46 (1.10 – 1.94) 0.008 1.30 (0.97 – 1.74) 0.07
Speedball injection*
 (Daily vs Not daily) 1.28 (0.82 – 2.02) 0.281
HIV serostatus
 (Positive vs Negative) 1.90 (1.38 – 2.61) <0.001 1.85 (1.34 – 2.55) <0.001
Hospital referral
 (Yes vs No) 3.28 (2.14 – 5.04) <0.001 2.97 (1.93 – 4.57) <0.001

Note:

*

Behaviours refer to activities in the last six months.

Indicates data derived from SIF database and by a study nurse. Model was fit adjusted for all variables p < 0.05 in unadjusted analyses.

CI = confidence interval, DTES = Downtown Eastside.