Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;2(6):704–716. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.10.18

Table 2. Intra-operative outcomes of robotic MVS studies with ≥50 patients.

Paper CPB time (min) XC time (min) Conversion to non-robotic (%) Conversion to robotic replacement (%)
Mihaljevic 2013 (27) Resections: 119±34 Resections: 86±28 NA NA
Neochordae: 106±22 Neochordae: 79±16
Nifong 2012 (19) With cryoablation: 188.5±53.8 With cryoablation: 130.6±28.4 0.2 0.0
Without cryoablation 153.2±37.7 Without cryoablation: 116.6±31.6
Stevens 2012 (26) 164±40 125±31
Suri 2011 (29) 113.3±40.4 81.4±28.3 0.0 NA
Mihaljevic 2011 (30) 116M 85 M 9.1
Cheng 2010 (21) 156.9±43.5 116.6±30.6 4.9 1.7
Kam 2010 (31) 126.39 94.93 NA NA
Mihaljevic 2010 (32) Interrupted sutures: median 139 M (CL 109-180) Interrupted sutures: median 100 M (CL 75-133) NA NA
Running sutures: median 107 M (CL 91-151) Running sutures: median 81M (CL 62-110)
Chitwood 2008 (22) 158.7±41.8 122.1±33.3 2.9 0.0
Rodriguez 2008 (23) AL repair: 136±30 AL repair:104±20 0.0 0.0
BL repair: 182±53 BL repair: 140±40
Cook 2007 (33) U-clips: 144±50 U-clips: 105.2±29.6 NA NA
Sutures (cohort B): 162±38 Sutures (cohort B): 124±27
Murphy 2006 (10) Repairs: 131±34 Repairs: 102±28 4.7 0.0
Replacements: 182±27 Replacements: 146±20
Nifong 2005 (24) 168.8±47.3 124.1±34.0 0.0 NA

Data presented as mean ± SD, unless otherwise specified. CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; XC, cross-clamp; AL, anterior leaflet; BL, bileaflet; M, median; NA, not available.