Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;2(6):693–703. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.11.08

Table 5. Perioperative clinical and time-related outcomes of patients who underwent mitral valve repair through a minimally invasive thoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy approach.

Outcomes Included studies Overall statistics
Clinical outcomes No. of studies MIMVR (n) Sternotomy (n) Relative risk (95% CI) P-value I2 (%)
   Mortality 7 952 1,011 1.23 (0.22-6.88) 0.81 0
   Cerebrovascular accidents* 6 906 929 1.43 (0.74-2.76) 0.29 0
   Renal failure 3 284 305 0.96 (0.31-3.00) 0.95 0
   Wound infection 4 634 670 2.97 (0.47-18.87) 0.25 29
   Reoperation for bleeding 6 848 896 1.25 (0.60-2.62) 0.55 35
   Aortic dissection 4 688 724 4.84 (0.55-42.43) 0.15 0
   Myocardial infarction 3 284 305 1.15 (0.24-5.64) 0.86 0
   Readmission within 30 days 2 308 315 0.61 (0.31-1.21) 0.16 0
Time-related outcomes No. of studies MIMVR (n) Sternotomy (n) Standard mean difference (95% CI) P-value I2 (%)
   Cross-clamp time 6 852 911 1.47 (0.52-2.42) 0.003 99
   CPB time 6 952 1,011 1.46 (0.40-2.51) 0.007 99
   ICU stay 2 247 247 –0.77 (–1.36-0.17) 0.01 88
   Length of hospitalization 4 658 694 –0.24 (–0.65-0.18) 0.26 92

MIMVR, minimally invasive mitral valve repair; CI, confidence interval; *, includes stroke with or without transient ischaemic attack; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; ICU, intensive care unit.