Table 2.
R2 | p-value | partial R | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | ||||
CIUs/min (efficiency) | AF-LL* | 0.66 | 0.000 | −0.302* |
fGM-LL | 0.58 | 0.000 | −0.116 | |
AF-fGM-LL | 0.59 | 0.000 | ||
Words/min (rate) | AF-LL* | 0.53 | 0.000 | −0.321* |
fGM-LL | 0.43 | 0.000 | −0.044 | |
AF-fGM-LL | 0.45 | 0.000 | ||
BNT (naming) | AF-LL* | 0.49 | 0.000 | −0.249* |
fGM-LL | 0.44 | 0.000 | −0.102 | |
AF-fGM-LL | 0.42 | 0.000 | ||
B | ||||
CIUs/min (efficiency) | AF-LL* | 0.63 | 0.000 | −0.547* |
EMC-LL | 0.33 | 0.000 | −0.042 | |
UF-LL | 0.28 | 0.001 | 0.109 | |
Words/min (rate) | AF-LL* | 0.53 | 0.000 | −0.529* |
EMC-LL | 0.25 | 0.001 | −0.03 | |
UF-LL | 0.25 | 0.002 | 0.18 | |
BNT (naming) | AF-LL* | 0.44 | 0.000 | −0.273* |
EMC-LL | 0.35 | 0.000 | −0.194 | |
UF-LL | 0.28 | 0.001 | 0.197 |
Table 2A represents regression models with AF, fGM, and Combined lesion loads. Table 2B presents values from AF, EMC, and UF regression models. Semipartial correlation coefficients are shown from multiple regression models including both maps representing significant unique contribution to prediction models. Asterisks mark significant unique contribution to predicting behavioral outcome derived from partial R2 significance.