Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: DNA Repair (Amst). 2013 Oct 8;12(12):10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.09.006. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.09.006

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Gap-repair efficiency, CO-NCO distribution and hetDNA classes obtained using un-purified plasmid DNA. (A) Each data point corresponds to the His+:Leu+ ratio obtained in an independent transformation experiment. The mean ratio for each strain is relative to that obtained when the WT strain was transformed with un-Me DNA. (B) Percentages of CO and NCO events are indicated by light and dark shading, respectively. (C) Distributions of sequenced NCO products into five classes (I-V; see text for description) based on the presence and position of hetDNA in the repaired plasmid allele. The total number of events analyzed (N) in panels B and C is given below the strain genotype and plasmid-methylation status. All strains were mlh1Δ.