Table 11.

Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting 2006 eligibility criteria for MTM services based on logistic regression (sensitivity analysis 7).^a

	Estimate	Standard error	Wald chi-square	P	Odds ratio (OR)	95% confidence interval for OR
Intercept	−1.34	2.50	0.29	0.59	-	-
Non-Hispanic Whites	-	-	-	-	-	-
Non-Hispanic Blacks	−15.11	0.31	2411.10	<.0001	<.0001	<.0001–<.0001
Hispanics	−1.36	0.65	4.40	0.04	0.26	0.07–0.91
Age	−0.14	0.04	14.72	0.0001	0.87	0.81–0.93
Female	-	-	-	-	-	-
Male	−1.05	0.32	10.76	0.001	0.35	0.19–0.66
Not married	-	-	-	-	-	-
Married	0.15	0.33	0.19	0.66	1.16	0.60–2.22
Lower than high school	-	-	-	-	-	-
High school	−0.53	0.38	1.94	0.16	0.59	0.28–1.24
Higher than high school	−0.16	0.37	0.19	0.67	0.85	0.41–1.77
100% FPLb	-	-	-	-	-	-
100%–149% FPL	0.31	0.68	0.21	0.65	1.36	0.36–5.13
150%–199% FPL	0.20	0.65	0.10	0.75	1.23	0.35–4.36
200%–300% FPL	0.55	0.70	0.60	0.44	1.73	0.43–6.87
Higher than 300% FPL	1.44	0.58	6.14	0.01	4.20	1.35–13.07
Northeast	-	-	-	-	-	-
Midwest	0.29	0.57	0.26	0.61	1.33	0.44–4.04
South	0.15	0.54	0.08	0.78	1.16	0.40–3.33
West	0.65	0.62	1.12	0.29	1.93	0.57–6.48
Not MSAc	-	-	-	-	-	-
Yes MSA	0.26	0.48	0.30	0.59	1.30	0.51–3.34
Excellent self-perceived health status	-	-	-	-	-	-
Very good self-perceived health status	0.69	1.17	0.35	0.55	2.00	0.20–19.64
Good self-perceived health status	1.04	1.15	0.82	0.36	2.83	0.30–26.91
Fair self-perceived health status	3.46	1.03	11.28	0.0008	31.86	4.23–240.01
Poor self-perceived health status	4.41	1.10	16.06	<.0001	82.36	9.53–712.09
Risk adjustment summary score	6.47	1.66	15.22	<.0001	647.97	25.08->999.99

^aEligibility thresholds examined: 23 Part D drugs, 3 chronic conditions, and $4,000 in drug costs. Wald’s statistic: 9243.42 (P < .0001).

^bFPL=Federal poverty level.

^cMSA=Metropolitan statistical Area.