Table 12.

Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting 2006 eligibility criteria for MTM services based on logistic regression (sensitivity analysis 8).^a

	Estimate	Standard error	Wald chi-square	P	Odds ratio (OR)	95% confidence interval for OR
Intercept	−0.89	2.67	0.11	0.74	-	-
Non-Hispanic Whites	-	-	-	-	-	-
Non-Hispanic Blacks	−15.17	0.34	2047.97	<0.0001	0.74	<.0001–<.0001
Hispanics	−1.23	0.66	3.45	0.063	0.80	0.80–1.07
Age	−0.16	0.04	14.50	0.0001	0.96	0.79–0.93
Female	-	-	-	-	-	-
Male	−1.09	0.39	7.67	0.006	0.68	0.16–0.73
Not married	-	-	-	-	-	-
Married	0.09	0.38	0.55	0.82	1.01	0.52–2.32
Lower than high school	-	-	-	-	-	-
High school	−0.52	0.42	1.53	0.22	1.01	0.26–1.36
Higher than high school	−0.22	0.43	0.25	0.62	1.18	0.35–1.88
100% FPLb	-	-	-	-	-	-
100%–149% FPL	0.04	0.68	0.003	0.95	1.25	0.27–3.96
150%–199% FPL	0.29	0.67	0.18	0.67	1.26	0.35–5.00
200%–300% FPL	0.51	0.76	0.45	0.50	1.57	0.38–7.44
Higher than 300% FPL	1.37	0.64	4.65	0.03	1.52	1.13–13.71
Northeast	-	-	-	-	-	-
Midwest	0.63	0.59	1.11	0.29	0.90	0.59–5.98
South	0.37	0.58	0.40	0.53	0.81	0.46–4.47
West	0.90	0.62	2.13	0.14	0.66	0.74–8.26
Not MSAc	-	-	-	-	-	-
Yes MSA	0.30	0.46	0.44	0.51	0.85	0.55–3.33
Excellent self-perceived health status	-	-	-	-	-	-
Very good self-perceived health status	0.06	1.22	0.002	0.96	2.49	0.10–11.53
Good self-perceived health status	0.86	1.17	0.54	0.46	4.41	0.24–23.64
Fair self-perceived health status	3.37	1.02	10.98	0.0009	9.05	3.97–214.94
Poor self-perceived health status	4.15	1.05	1.55	<.0001	13.55	8.05–502.82
Risk adjustment summary score	7.05	1.70	1.70	<.0001	17.71	40.78->999.99

^aEligibility thresholds examined: 23 Part D drugs, 5 chronic conditions, and $4,000 in drug costs. Wald’s statistic: 7152.38 (P < .0001).

^bFPL=Federal poverty level.

^cMSA=Metropolitan statistical Area.