Table 7.

Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting 2006 eligibility criteria for MTM services based on logistic regression (sensitivity analysis 3).^a

	Estimate	Standard error	Wald chi-square	P	Odds ratio (OR)	95% confidence interval for OR
Intercept	−2.17	0.75	8.46	0.004	-	-
Non-Hispanic Whites	-	-	-	-	-	-
Non-Hispanic Blacks	−0.40	0.16	5.90	0.02	0.67	0.49–0.93
Hispanics	−0.40	0.20	3.82	0.10	0.67	0.45–1.00
Age	−0.05	0.01	15.02	0.05	0.95	0.93–0.98
Female	-	-	-	-	-	-
Male	−0.39	0.11	14.10	0.0001	0.67	0.55–0.83
Not married	-	-	-	-	-	-
Married	0.02	0.11	0.04	0.0002	1.02	0.83–1.26
Lower than high school	-	-	-	-	-	-
High school	0.01	0.11	0.01	0.83	1.01	0.82–1.26
Higher than high school	0.19	0.11	2.90	0.91	1.21	0.97–1.52
100% FPLb	-	-	-	-	-	-
100%–149% FPL	0.20	0.12	2.32	0.09	1.22	0.96–1.56
150%–199% FPL	0.13	0.16	0.71	0.11	1.14	0.84–1.55
200%–300% FPL	0.43	0.15	8.00	0.40	1.54	1.14–2.08
Higher than 300% FPL	0.40	0.13	10.15	0.005	1.49	1.17–1.91
Northeast	-	-	-	-	-	-
Midwest	−0.11	0.14	0.58	0.45	0.90	0.68–1.18
South	−0.28	0.13	4.95	0.03	0.76	0.59–0.97
West	−0.51	0.19	7.33	0.01	0.60	0.41–0.87
Not MSAc	-	-	-	-	-	-
Yes MSA	−0.23	0.12	3.74	0.05	0.80	0.63–1.00
Excellent self-perceived health status	-	-	-	-	-	-
Very good self-perceived health status	0.77	0.23	11.48	0.0007	2.15	1.38–3.36
Good self-perceived health status	1.67	0.24	50.54	<.0001	5.32	3.36–8.44
Fair self-perceived health status	2.44	0.24	101.97	<.0001	11.47	7.14–18.41
Poor self-perceived health status	3.07	0.26	134.99	<.0001	21.61	12.87–36.29
Risk adjustment summary score	3.38	0.60	31.41	<.0001	29.26	8.98–95.30

^aEligibility thresholds examined: 2 Part D drugs, 5 chronic conditions, and $4,000 in drug costs. Wald’s statistic: 935.44 (P < .0001).

^bFPL=Federal poverty level.

^cMSA=Metropolitan statistical Area.